Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDesroches, M. 
dc.contributor.authorRinzel, J.
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, S. 
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-06T13:40:02Z
dc.date.available2022-02-06T13:40:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11824/1424
dc.description.abstractBursting is one of the fundamental rhythms that excitable cells can generate either in response to incoming stimuli or intrinsically. It has been a topic of intense research in computational biology for several decades. The classification of bursting oscillations in excitable systems has been the subject of active research since the early 1980s and is still ongoing. As a by-product it establishes analytical and numerical foundations for studying complex temporal behaviors in multiple-timescale models of cellular activity. In this review, we first present the seminal works of Rinzel and Izhikevich in classifying bursting patterns of excitable systems. We recall a complementary mathematical classification approach by Bertram et al., and then by Golubitsky et al., which together with the Rinzel-Izhikevich proposals provide the state-of-the-art foundations to these classifications. Beyond classical approaches, we review a recent bursting example that falls outside the previous classification systems. Generalizing this example leads us to propose an extended classification, which requires the analysis of both fast and slow subsystems of an underlying slow-fast model and allows the dissection of a larger class of bursters. Namely, we provide a general framework for bursting systems with both subthreshold and superthreshold oscillations. A new class of bursters with at least two slow variables is then added, which we denote folded-node bursters, to convey the idea that the bursts are initiated or annihilated via a folded-node singularity. Key to this mechanism are so-called canard or duck orbits, organizing the underpinning excitability structure. We describe the two main families of folded-node bursters, depending upon the phase (active/spiking or silent/non-spiking) of the bursting cycle during which folded-node dynamics occurs. We classify both families and give examples of minimal systems displaying these novel bursting patterns. Finally, we provide a biophysical example by reinterpreting a generic conductance-based episodic burster as a folded-node burster, showing that the associated framework can explain its subthreshold oscillations over a larger parameter region than the fast-subsystem approach.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsReconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Españaen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/en_US
dc.titleClassification of bursting patterns: A tale of two ducksen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.relation.projectIDES/1PE/SEV-2017-0718en_US
dc.relation.projectIDES/2PE/RTI2018-093860-B-C21en_US
dc.relation.projectIDEUS/BERC/BERC.2018-2021en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionen_US
dc.journal.titlePLoS Computational Biologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España