Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaur I.
dc.contributor.authorMentrelli A.
dc.contributor.authorBosseur F.
dc.contributor.authorFilippi J.-B.
dc.contributor.authorPagnini G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-13T13:33:23Z
dc.date.available2016-06-13T13:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.identifier.issn1007-5704
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11824/188
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a mathematical approach to model the effects and the role of phenomena with random nature such as turbulence and fire-spotting into the existing wildfire simulators. The formulation proposes that the propagation of the fire-front is the sum of a drifting component (obtained from an existing wildfire simulator without turbulence and fire-spotting) and a random fluctuating component. The modelling of the random effects is embodied in a probability density function accounting for the fluctuations around the fire perimeter which is given by the drifting component. In past, this formulation has been applied to include these random effects into a wildfire simulator based on an Eulerian moving interface method, namely the Level Set Method (LSM), but in this paper the same formulation is adapted for a wildfire simulator based on a Lagrangian front tracking technique, namely the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS). The main highlight of the present study is the comparison of the performance of a Lagrangian and an Eulerian moving interface method when applied to wild-land fire propagation. Simple idealised numerical experiments are used to investigate the potential applicability of the proposed formulation to DEVS and to compare its behaviour with respect to the LSM. The results show that DEVS based wildfire propagation model qualitatively improves its performance (e.g., reproducing flank and back fire, increase in fire spread due to pre-heating of the fuel by hot air and firebrands, fire propagation across no fuel zones, secondary fire generation, ...) when random effects are included according to the present formulation. The performance of DEVS and LSM based wildfire models is comparable and the only differences which arise among the two are due to the differences in the geometrical construction of the direction of propagation. Though the results presented here are devoid of any validation exercise and provide only a proof of concept, they show a strong inclination towards an intended operational use. The existing LSM or DEVS based operational simulators like WRF-SFIRE and ForeFire respectively can serve as an ideal basis for the same.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/
dc.subjectDiscrete Event System Specification
dc.subjectFire simulators
dc.subjectFire-spotting
dc.subjectForeFire
dc.subjectLevel Set Method
dc.subjectRandom phenomena
dc.subjectTurbulence
dc.subjectWildland fire propagation
dc.titleTurbulence and fire-spotting effects into wild-land fire simulators
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.03.003
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1007570416300752


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess